A business growth ecosystem equipping Founders, Investors, and Operators with the systems, tools, capital, and support to build profitable, self-sustaining companies.


Most sales hiring processes evaluate the wrong thing.
They look at the resume. They run through experience. They ask about past performance. They gauge whether the person seems confident, articulate, personable. And then they make an offer.
What they do not test is the one trait that determines whether a sales rep will actually produce: the ability to handle rejection and come back from it.
That gap is why most sales hires fail.
Sales candidates are not lying when they describe their track record. Most of them believe what they are telling you. They had good months. They hit targets at some point. They know how to present themselves confidently because that is the job they are applying for.
The problem is that presenting yourself to someone who wants to hear you is a fundamentally different skill than closing a deal with someone who does not want to hear from you at all. The interview is, by design, a setting where you are expected to perform. The real sales job is a setting where rejection is the default.
You cannot measure how someone handles rejection by asking them how they handle rejection. They will tell you they handle it well. Every single candidate will tell you that.
You have to create the rejection and observe the response.
At some point in the first interview, roughly 50 to 75 percent of the way through the conversation, you stop the normal flow and deliver a rejection.
It sounds something like this: "I want to be straight with you. I am really looking for one rock star, someone who can come in and generate serious business from day one. I am not sure I am seeing that rock star potential in this conversation. You might be someone I would consider if the pool is narrow, but I am genuinely holding out for someone who stands out."
Then you stop talking. You sit. You wait.
This is the moment.
A significant portion of candidates will thank you for your time and start wrapping up. They are polite. They are gracious. And they have just disqualified themselves. Not because they cannot sell, but because they folded on the first real objection they faced, and you gave them every opportunity to come back from it.
A smaller number will do something different. They will push back. They will make their case. They will not accept the premise that they have not demonstrated value. They might say something like: "I hear that. Let me push back on that a little, because I think there are things in my background you may not have seen yet." And then they will close you.
That response is the job. Right there in the interview room, they just demonstrated exactly what they will do when a prospect says they are not interested. They acknowledged the objection, reframed it, and kept the conversation open.
Those candidates get the second interview.
The rejection test is not a trick. It is a simulation.
Sales is rejection at industrial scale. A good rep hears "no" dozens of times for every "yes." The psychological makeup required to absorb that rejection, reset, and dial again is not teachable in a short window. It is either there or it is not.
What you are doing in the interview is shortening the discovery window from 90 days of employment to 90 minutes of conversation. Instead of finding out that someone cannot handle rejection after you have already trained them, onboarded them, and given them a territory, you find out in the first conversation.
The ones who push back have demonstrated the exact behavior you are hiring for. The ones who fold have saved you both time.
The Talent Acquisition Plan builds this into the process before the first call is scheduled. It defines what traits the role requires, how those traits will be tested, and what evaluation criteria determine a pass or a fail at each stage.
The Psychometric Profile Process adds another layer — standardized assessments that reveal behavioral tendencies, drive, and resilience before the hiring conversation begins. These two tools together mean you are not relying on instinct or impression to make a $60,000-plus staffing decision.
The rejection test sits inside that framework. It is not an improvised moment. It is a designed interview stage with a clear purpose and a clear evaluation standard.
The industry average for a bad sales hire is six to twelve months of wasted salary, training, and opportunity cost. The candidate looked good in the interview. They presented well. They said all the right things. And then the rejection came — from real prospects, in real conditions — and they could not sustain it.
The test does not eliminate every bad hire. But it eliminates the most common one: the candidate who performs in the room and folds in the field.
You want to know if your sales hire can sell. Make them prove it before you write the offer.
— David Robertson / TheDavidRobertson.com

Have a question or want to connect with me?

David Robertson is a serial entrepreneur, investor, and coach passionate about Advancing the Kingdom of Christ in business.
© David Robertson | All Rights Reserved | This Site Designed by GrowthpointCRM™
Disclaimer:
All content on this website is authored by David Robertson, an experienced business consultant. The views and opinions expressed are his own and do not reflect those of any current or former employers, including International Services, Inc. (ISI) or its affiliates. Professional consulting services are currently provided exclusively through ISI or its affiliated companies. Employment statuses and affiliations are subject to change without notice.
Any investments or investment activities mentioned are conducted solely through Robertson Equities, LLC. and are not associated with or endorsed by ISI or its affiliates. ISI and its affiliates are not responsible for the content on this website or any online activities conducted by David Robertson.
David Robertson makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on TheDavidRobertson.com or from any links found on this site. He will not be liable for any errors or omissions, nor for the availability of this information.